Here is the link to the 60 minutes transcript and video. It four pages long, but worth reading. The last time I looked there were over 20 pages of comments also:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/25/60minutes/main3752515.shtml#
Showing posts with label home prices. Show all posts
Showing posts with label home prices. Show all posts
Monday, January 28, 2008
Thursday, January 17, 2008
SoCal Housing Articles
For the Kingman realtors that think Kingman houses will gain value and/or stay at the current values, perhaps they should check out the SoCal market. Many areas of Socal are already less expensive than Mohave County and have further to fall.
http://www.dailybulletin.com/ci_7981286
I.E. home sales tumble
By Michael Rappaport, Staff Writer
Article Created: 01/15/2008 06:57:15 PM PST
December usually isn't a bad month for home sales, but December 2007 was one for the books.
According to Tuesday's monthly report from DataQuick Information Systems of La Jolla, only 13,240 new and resale homes and condominiums were sold in Southern California last month, the worst December on record by a wide margin.
Nearly 24 percent fewer homes sold last month than in December 1990, the previous worst.
The median price of a home in Southern California has dropped from $490,000 to $425,000 in the last year, with every one of the six counties in the region down by more than 10 percent.
San Bernardino County's off 14.9percent to $315,000
*******
http://www.pe.com/business/local/stories/PE_News_Local_B_dataquick16.3537580.html
Region's housing market stays in 'midst of turbulence'
10:00 PM PST on Tuesday, January 15, 2008
By JACK KATZANEKThe Press-Enterprise
Home prices in Inland Southern California continued to fall in December, and sales numbers in Riverside and San Bernardino counties are down about 50 percent from where they were a year ago, DataQuick Information Systems reported.
The record highs were $432,000 in Riverside County and $380,000 in San Bernardino County, both set about a year ago. Five years ago, the median home in the Inland area sold for about $200,000.
And this statement from the article says it all:
Esmael Adibi, chief economist for Chapman University, said mortgage rates are looking favorable right now, but prices won't start to rebound until the buyers come back to the table. Right now, Adibi said, most are not earning enough money to qualify.
And that is the problem, prices got out of control everywhere and it wasn't a problem because no one was required to qualify for the loans. Now that banks are starting to act responsibly, prices will have to drop to a price that is affordable to buyers.
http://www.dailybulletin.com/ci_7981286
I.E. home sales tumble
By Michael Rappaport, Staff Writer
Article Created: 01/15/2008 06:57:15 PM PST
December usually isn't a bad month for home sales, but December 2007 was one for the books.
According to Tuesday's monthly report from DataQuick Information Systems of La Jolla, only 13,240 new and resale homes and condominiums were sold in Southern California last month, the worst December on record by a wide margin.
Nearly 24 percent fewer homes sold last month than in December 1990, the previous worst.
The median price of a home in Southern California has dropped from $490,000 to $425,000 in the last year, with every one of the six counties in the region down by more than 10 percent.
San Bernardino County's off 14.9percent to $315,000
*******
http://www.pe.com/business/local/stories/PE_News_Local_B_dataquick16.3537580.html
Region's housing market stays in 'midst of turbulence'
10:00 PM PST on Tuesday, January 15, 2008
By JACK KATZANEKThe Press-Enterprise
Home prices in Inland Southern California continued to fall in December, and sales numbers in Riverside and San Bernardino counties are down about 50 percent from where they were a year ago, DataQuick Information Systems reported.
The record highs were $432,000 in Riverside County and $380,000 in San Bernardino County, both set about a year ago. Five years ago, the median home in the Inland area sold for about $200,000.
And this statement from the article says it all:
Esmael Adibi, chief economist for Chapman University, said mortgage rates are looking favorable right now, but prices won't start to rebound until the buyers come back to the table. Right now, Adibi said, most are not earning enough money to qualify.
And that is the problem, prices got out of control everywhere and it wasn't a problem because no one was required to qualify for the loans. Now that banks are starting to act responsibly, prices will have to drop to a price that is affordable to buyers.
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Overview of impact fees
Lake Havasu is considering impact fees:
Overview of impact fees
Proposed taxes put city in the middle of the pack
By John RudolfWednesday, December 12, 2007 9:51 PM MST
To builders and developers, it is a burdensome tax that discourages growth. To cities struggling to maintain services and infrastructure as populations swell, it represents a critical tool for generating revenue. But with impact fees now officially on the City Council's agenda, both sides will have plenty of time to debate over the next several months.
http://www.havasunews.com/articles/2007/12/12/news/doc4760b935c6199640416552.txt
Overview of impact fees
Proposed taxes put city in the middle of the pack
By John RudolfWednesday, December 12, 2007 9:51 PM MST
To builders and developers, it is a burdensome tax that discourages growth. To cities struggling to maintain services and infrastructure as populations swell, it represents a critical tool for generating revenue. But with impact fees now officially on the City Council's agenda, both sides will have plenty of time to debate over the next several months.
http://www.havasunews.com/articles/2007/12/12/news/doc4760b935c6199640416552.txt
Labels:
builders,
developers,
growth,
home prices,
impact fees,
infrastructure,
Lake Havasu
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
How low must housing prices go?
Commentary: Figure at least another 20% before families can afford to buy
By Dr. Irwin Kellner, MarketWatch
Last update: 11:23 p.m. EST Dec. 3, 2007
PORT WASHINGTON, N.Y. (MarketWatch) -- Housing will revive when prices come down to the point where demand rises enough to reduce the huge supply of unsold homes now overhanging the market. That said, this point is a long way off.
Today, median home prices are 3.5 times the size of median annual family incomes. This may be down from the recent peak of 4.2 times incomes reached last year, but it's way above the 2.8 times that home prices averaged during 1984-2000, when lots of homes were bought, sold and built.
And if you think 2.8 is low, check out the early 1970s. That was when home prices were only 2.3 times median family incomes, and housing was selling like gangbusters.
To get prices back to 2.8 times family incomes would require a drop of 20% from today's levels - and this does not take into account interest rates and lending standards.
To equal the affordability of the early 1970s, prices would have to fall a whopping 38%.
Those who say such declines can't happen are ignoring how fast home prices rose in the first half of this decade. In most parts of the country, housing prices doubled during this five-year period while incomes went up only a fraction as much.
Sellers could always hold the line and wait for family incomes to rise. But this clearly won't happen overnight - and, besides, it's a buyer's market and no one wants to buy today knowing that prices might well be lower tomorrow.
After all, when it comes to housing prices, what matters most is not the cost of construction, nor what surrounding homes might be selling for.
Simply put, it's affordability.
And until they are more affordable, houses won't sell.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/irwin-kellner-how-low-must/story.aspx?guid=%7B501755BA-5015-43E7-B2A3-E2A3536ADF71%7D&dist=hplatest
By Dr. Irwin Kellner, MarketWatch
Last update: 11:23 p.m. EST Dec. 3, 2007
PORT WASHINGTON, N.Y. (MarketWatch) -- Housing will revive when prices come down to the point where demand rises enough to reduce the huge supply of unsold homes now overhanging the market. That said, this point is a long way off.
Today, median home prices are 3.5 times the size of median annual family incomes. This may be down from the recent peak of 4.2 times incomes reached last year, but it's way above the 2.8 times that home prices averaged during 1984-2000, when lots of homes were bought, sold and built.
And if you think 2.8 is low, check out the early 1970s. That was when home prices were only 2.3 times median family incomes, and housing was selling like gangbusters.
To get prices back to 2.8 times family incomes would require a drop of 20% from today's levels - and this does not take into account interest rates and lending standards.
To equal the affordability of the early 1970s, prices would have to fall a whopping 38%.
Those who say such declines can't happen are ignoring how fast home prices rose in the first half of this decade. In most parts of the country, housing prices doubled during this five-year period while incomes went up only a fraction as much.
Sellers could always hold the line and wait for family incomes to rise. But this clearly won't happen overnight - and, besides, it's a buyer's market and no one wants to buy today knowing that prices might well be lower tomorrow.
After all, when it comes to housing prices, what matters most is not the cost of construction, nor what surrounding homes might be selling for.
Simply put, it's affordability.
And until they are more affordable, houses won't sell.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/irwin-kellner-how-low-must/story.aspx?guid=%7B501755BA-5015-43E7-B2A3-E2A3536ADF71%7D&dist=hplatest
Monday, November 26, 2007
How a housing boom turned into a bust
Housing woes have domino effect
By Kathy Chu with Sharon Silke Carty, Greg Farrell, Barbara Hagenbaugh, Edward Iwata, Noelle Knox and Adam Shell
If you haven't yet felt the impact of the nation's credit crisis, just wait. Chances are, you won't have to wait long.
So far, the turmoil may feel a bit remote for average people: Failed mortgage lenders. Gargantuan write-downs by banks. Foreclosures for people who couldn't really afford the mortgages they got.
What about the rest of us? Are we in danger? No one knows for sure, but quite likely, yes.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2007-11-25-credit-crunch_N.htm
A good article from USA Today with lots of charts.
By Kathy Chu with Sharon Silke Carty, Greg Farrell, Barbara Hagenbaugh, Edward Iwata, Noelle Knox and Adam Shell
If you haven't yet felt the impact of the nation's credit crisis, just wait. Chances are, you won't have to wait long.
So far, the turmoil may feel a bit remote for average people: Failed mortgage lenders. Gargantuan write-downs by banks. Foreclosures for people who couldn't really afford the mortgages they got.
What about the rest of us? Are we in danger? No one knows for sure, but quite likely, yes.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2007-11-25-credit-crunch_N.htm
A good article from USA Today with lots of charts.
Labels:
banks,
boom,
bubble,
credit crisis,
foreclosures,
home prices,
securities,
subprime mortgages
U.S.Real Estate:How it affects your financial future
Here is an interesting YouTube video, there are several more by the same people listed on the right side of the page.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5kNJgLwD3Y&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5kNJgLwD3Y&feature=related
Monday, November 19, 2007
Tucson - Builders call for relief on local home- impact fees
By Christie Smythe
Arizona Daily Star
Tucson, Arizona Published: 11.15.2007
Home builders are working to roll back or delay some Tucson-area impact fees to help the new-home industry weather its slump.
The Southern Arizona Home Builders Association has been asking local governments to allow builders to postpone paying impact fees until after houses are sold rather than when construction permits are issued. The organization also is working to delay and temporarily reduce a new impact fee in Marana.
http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/211719
Arizona Daily Star
Tucson, Arizona Published: 11.15.2007
Home builders are working to roll back or delay some Tucson-area impact fees to help the new-home industry weather its slump.
The Southern Arizona Home Builders Association has been asking local governments to allow builders to postpone paying impact fees until after houses are sold rather than when construction permits are issued. The organization also is working to delay and temporarily reduce a new impact fee in Marana.
http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/211719
Friday, November 16, 2007
Why Would Anyone Want to Move To.....
Someone on the topix forum mentioned Kentucky and the low cost of housing and mild weather. I mentioned that retiree's would likely move to where ever they felt the cost of living was lowest and fit their wants.
One of the local realtors said "Who wants to retire and live in Kentucky? "
I have always said that not every retiree wants to live in a hot climate and I looked on a California city-data forum that was asking where people were going to move if they left California. Only two mentioned AZ and one of those said they had moved but they wanted to move back to Calif. Of the rest of the comments, Colorado stood out as one of the top destinations, which pretty much fits in with where people I know have moved or want to move to. Many also mentioned what they were looking for was...1)low cost of housing 2) small rural town 3) no need for extensive shopping etc. I clipped the "where we're going part" out of each of the individual posts.......Here it is:
We've been thinking about moving to San Antonio
We have found the cost of living in Tennessee
We are researching Arkansas
We are deciding between three towns in western WA
I'm staying put, right here in California
I have made the decision to leave CA and am moving to NE Arkansas
I just got back from my second scouting trip to Denver.
I have been looking at Oregon, WA, and Wisc. I like cold weather. I'm sick of the heat.
no reason for us to want to live back in California. Colorado itself is stunningly beautiful.
We moved two years ago from Chico to Arizona.
we are going to Kalispell mt.
We are heading for Gig Harbor Wa.
My daugher moved back to Tennessee
We sold that house after only a year and moved to Southern Utah
Be sure you understand how truly HOT it is in Vegas...we are usually a few degrees cooler in St George than Vegas and it is unbearable.
in reference to moving from CA to San Antonio, you wouldn't be alone. Californians are moving down here in DROVES.
We are looking at Northern Co, Loveland/Ft Collins area, also looking at Tulsa and possibly Boise, Idaho.
We moved from Sac a year ago to Portland, OR
I heard great things about Austin
I have considered Austin Texas myself....I may end up in Texas, Tennesee or somewhere similar.
born and raised in Cali, We are moving out next summer to Colorado,
You'll find very few if any people who have regretted their move from California to Colorado
We left to move to Southern Florida
I moved back to my home state (Michigan)
we are actually considering moving BACK to California.....AZ has been affordable
Nope, not moving.
One of the local realtors said "Who wants to retire and live in Kentucky? "
I have always said that not every retiree wants to live in a hot climate and I looked on a California city-data forum that was asking where people were going to move if they left California. Only two mentioned AZ and one of those said they had moved but they wanted to move back to Calif. Of the rest of the comments, Colorado stood out as one of the top destinations, which pretty much fits in with where people I know have moved or want to move to. Many also mentioned what they were looking for was...1)low cost of housing 2) small rural town 3) no need for extensive shopping etc. I clipped the "where we're going part" out of each of the individual posts.......Here it is:
We've been thinking about moving to San Antonio
We have found the cost of living in Tennessee
We are researching Arkansas
We are deciding between three towns in western WA
I'm staying put, right here in California
I have made the decision to leave CA and am moving to NE Arkansas
I just got back from my second scouting trip to Denver.
I have been looking at Oregon, WA, and Wisc. I like cold weather. I'm sick of the heat.
no reason for us to want to live back in California. Colorado itself is stunningly beautiful.
We moved two years ago from Chico to Arizona.
we are going to Kalispell mt.
We are heading for Gig Harbor Wa.
My daugher moved back to Tennessee
We sold that house after only a year and moved to Southern Utah
Be sure you understand how truly HOT it is in Vegas...we are usually a few degrees cooler in St George than Vegas and it is unbearable.
in reference to moving from CA to San Antonio, you wouldn't be alone. Californians are moving down here in DROVES.
We are looking at Northern Co, Loveland/Ft Collins area, also looking at Tulsa and possibly Boise, Idaho.
We moved from Sac a year ago to Portland, OR
I heard great things about Austin
I have considered Austin Texas myself....I may end up in Texas, Tennesee or somewhere similar.
born and raised in Cali, We are moving out next summer to Colorado,
You'll find very few if any people who have regretted their move from California to Colorado
We left to move to Southern Florida
I moved back to my home state (Michigan)
we are actually considering moving BACK to California.....AZ has been affordable
Nope, not moving.
Labels:
Arizona,
California,
Colorado,
home prices,
retirees
Monday, November 5, 2007
More on San Diego Housing Prices
Think home-price slide is over? The worst appears yet to come
UNION-TRIBUNE
November 4, 2007
After more than a year's worth of the Great American Mortgage Crisis, some real estate professionals still think the law of supply and demand will kick in to prevent home prices in San Diego from dropping too low.
But people often forget that the economic concept of “demand” also includes “ability” – i.e., ability to pay. As lenders tighten their standards on mortgages – standards that never should have gotten as lax as they were in the past few years – fewer San Diegans will have the ability to buy homes at their current prices.
The median family income in San Diego County is $69,400, according to the latest data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. That puts us slightly below the median family income of $73,700 in Madison, Wis.; $71,400 in Denver; $72,600 in Norwich, Conn.; or $72,800 in Worcester, Mass. – to cite some examples from HUD's database.
Although we make less money than the people in those cities, we pay more than twice as much for our housing.
In San Diego, the median sale price of an existing single-family home in the second quarter was $614,000, according to the National Association of Realtors. Compare that with $223,500 in Madison, $255,200 in Denver, $276,600 in Norwich and $278,900 in Worcester.
According to the Census Bureau, we are the 42nd-most-expensive county in the nation for median housing costs for owner-occupied units. But we are 142nd on the list of highest-paying metropolitan areas.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/calbreath/20071104-9999-1b4dean.html
UNION-TRIBUNE
November 4, 2007
After more than a year's worth of the Great American Mortgage Crisis, some real estate professionals still think the law of supply and demand will kick in to prevent home prices in San Diego from dropping too low.
But people often forget that the economic concept of “demand” also includes “ability” – i.e., ability to pay. As lenders tighten their standards on mortgages – standards that never should have gotten as lax as they were in the past few years – fewer San Diegans will have the ability to buy homes at their current prices.
The median family income in San Diego County is $69,400, according to the latest data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. That puts us slightly below the median family income of $73,700 in Madison, Wis.; $71,400 in Denver; $72,600 in Norwich, Conn.; or $72,800 in Worcester, Mass. – to cite some examples from HUD's database.
Although we make less money than the people in those cities, we pay more than twice as much for our housing.
In San Diego, the median sale price of an existing single-family home in the second quarter was $614,000, according to the National Association of Realtors. Compare that with $223,500 in Madison, $255,200 in Denver, $276,600 in Norwich and $278,900 in Worcester.
According to the Census Bureau, we are the 42nd-most-expensive county in the nation for median housing costs for owner-occupied units. But we are 142nd on the list of highest-paying metropolitan areas.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/calbreath/20071104-9999-1b4dean.html
Labels:
California,
home prices,
housing,
median income,
sSan Diego
Saturday, November 3, 2007
Mogul's advice to Realtors: Don't keep your day job
The Southern California market will get worse before it gets better, he warns a gathering. One survival strategy: Slash prices, now.
By Peter Y. Hong, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
November 3, 2007
Even Realtors can lose faith in the housing market.
Speaking to a gathering of industry professionals Friday, longtime California real estate titan Fred C. Sands called the housing market "pathetic" and said some agents needed to start looking for other work.
"If you've been in it for five or six years and are barely making a living, you might want to think about what you were doing before and get back into it -- you can come back in a couple of years," Sands told members of the California Assn. of Realtors meeting in Universal City.
In the short term, the local real estate market "is not going to get better," Sands said.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-homes3nov03,0,7824038.story?track=mostviewed-storylevel
By Peter Y. Hong, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
November 3, 2007
Even Realtors can lose faith in the housing market.
Speaking to a gathering of industry professionals Friday, longtime California real estate titan Fred C. Sands called the housing market "pathetic" and said some agents needed to start looking for other work.
"If you've been in it for five or six years and are barely making a living, you might want to think about what you were doing before and get back into it -- you can come back in a couple of years," Sands told members of the California Assn. of Realtors meeting in Universal City.
In the short term, the local real estate market "is not going to get better," Sands said.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-homes3nov03,0,7824038.story?track=mostviewed-storylevel
Friday, October 26, 2007
Foreclosures
I think I'll play with the foreclosure subject today. If you are planning on purchasing in Kingman or Mohave County, you need to do as much research as you can and foreclosures are an important part of the current market. I'll address the importance of this further down. I'll also add a couple of permanent links to our link section for foreclosure sites.
The Countrywide link also includes several other links on the left side of the page that go to other bank reo sites. All of the bank sites include addresses of the properties.
The foreclosure.com site is a pay site and does not include addresses without a subscription. However, the preforeclosures include a owner name and street name and using those the address can be looked up on the Mohave county tax accessor site.
The bank owned properties have added another "just pick a number" pricing level to an already "just pick a number" owner pricing level. If you don't do the research yourself, you are liable to buy a home that is as much as 100k more than another nearly identical house. I have found that the realtors don't seem to be following the foreclosure market and I would recommend doing your own research and not just blindly accepting your realtors word.
This is difficult to do with the information that the Mohave MLS supplies. Without addresses you are at the mercy of what the realtors choose to tell you about, unless you do your own research. You cannot just see a property on realtor.com and see that it is in your area of interest and contact the realtor.
I am lucky that I have access to a site that supplies the addresses for mls properties. It is a site that my realtor subscribes her buyers to. You can find out more by contacting either Sandy or Cecelia, whose sites are in the links on the right hand side. Both are very good at their jobs, not pushy sales types. They are just out to help you find and purchase a home without pressure. Sandy will help you find a home anywhere in Mohave County and will send you an email with each new listing that meets your criteria. Cecelia is a mortgage banker who can help you with a mortgage and also sends emails out with current interest and lending news.
The Mission Hills Estates subdivision is one that I can use to point out why knowledge is very important in this market. This subdivision was built in the spring of 2006. The houses are on 4000'+ lots. They are mostly 1869'+/- houses with some 1538'+/- floorplans. The original homes were priced from 239,000 to 299,000. A few of the smaller houses sold at the beginning. The builders apparently then rented out many of the remaining homes and the majority of the subdivision is still either rented or vacant. A California investor also purchased 5 of the larger homes for 289,000 in the summer of 2006.
Now fast forward to 2007. At least three of the smaller homes went into foreclosure and are now bank owned. Another two of the larger homes also went into foreclosure. All five of the investor homes were put on the market for 199,900 (90,000) less than he paid. None of them were sold even at the lower price and they have gone into foreclosure. Now here is where the bizarre pricing comes in.
Even though there were 1869' homes for sale for 199,900, one of the 1538' bank owned properties was originally priced by the bank at 229,000. They have since lowered it to 193,900. And as the 1869' homes go through foreclosure and become bank owned, the banks are listing them at a higher price than the owner listing.
There are six homes for sale as of today's listings. Two of the 1538' homes are 193,9000 and 195,500. The four 1869' homes are priced at 197,500, 199,900, 219,900, and 225,900. These houses are all the same, the two less expensive ones have never been lived in. The two more expensive ones may have been rentals.
Then we have the Rhodes Villas, another 69 home subdivision originally built and sold in late 2005. Nearly all were purchased by speculators and as they were completed were put back on the market for resale at an inflated price. A few were flipped for a profit in early 2006, but most owners ended up renting the homes out. By late 2006/early 2007, several were again put on the market. Some were priced at what they had paid, some were priced higher and some were priced lower. No real rhyme or reason to the "just pick a number" pricing.
Now fast forward to 2007. One of the original models was sold originally for 364,275 in 2005. The model was priced at about 140,000 above what the base prices were. The home went into foreclosure and is now bank owned. The bank has priced it at 199,000, it has 2192' and as of yet it has not sold. It has been listed for about 1.5 months. The second model home is still apparently owned by the original owner and may be rented. The third and final model home is owned by Rhodes and shows an original price of 299,824. It is currently on the market for 309,724 and has 1866'. The original non-model homes sold for 181, 825 to 255,875, depending on the upgrades added. The majority sold for around 181-205. A few are currently on the market, some priced at less than they paid in 2005.
There are many houses on the market priced at less than the current owners paid in 2005/2006. A house on our block is bank owned and priced at only $900. more than the last owner paid in 12/2004 and it has been on the market since August 8th.
As more and more foreclosures come on the market, opportunities to purchase homes for a reasonable amount should increase. The builder discounts and foreclosures should force the resale home prices down. Builders are continuing to grade and build homes, even as hundreds sit unsold on the market. Many home prices here doubled and tripled between late 2004 and early 2005 for no fundamental based reason. Lot prices went up as much as 20 times during the same period. The prices increased mainly due to a credit bubble and a frenzy of speculative buying. Prices are falling across the country and despite what the realtors tell you, it is not "different" in Mohave County.
If you are going to buy, do your own research. Do not depend on the advise of someone who's pay check depends on your purchase. Make sure you can afford the payments and don't depend on appreciation in the near future.
The Countrywide link also includes several other links on the left side of the page that go to other bank reo sites. All of the bank sites include addresses of the properties.
The foreclosure.com site is a pay site and does not include addresses without a subscription. However, the preforeclosures include a owner name and street name and using those the address can be looked up on the Mohave county tax accessor site.
The bank owned properties have added another "just pick a number" pricing level to an already "just pick a number" owner pricing level. If you don't do the research yourself, you are liable to buy a home that is as much as 100k more than another nearly identical house. I have found that the realtors don't seem to be following the foreclosure market and I would recommend doing your own research and not just blindly accepting your realtors word.
This is difficult to do with the information that the Mohave MLS supplies. Without addresses you are at the mercy of what the realtors choose to tell you about, unless you do your own research. You cannot just see a property on realtor.com and see that it is in your area of interest and contact the realtor.
I am lucky that I have access to a site that supplies the addresses for mls properties. It is a site that my realtor subscribes her buyers to. You can find out more by contacting either Sandy or Cecelia, whose sites are in the links on the right hand side. Both are very good at their jobs, not pushy sales types. They are just out to help you find and purchase a home without pressure. Sandy will help you find a home anywhere in Mohave County and will send you an email with each new listing that meets your criteria. Cecelia is a mortgage banker who can help you with a mortgage and also sends emails out with current interest and lending news.
The Mission Hills Estates subdivision is one that I can use to point out why knowledge is very important in this market. This subdivision was built in the spring of 2006. The houses are on 4000'+ lots. They are mostly 1869'+/- houses with some 1538'+/- floorplans. The original homes were priced from 239,000 to 299,000. A few of the smaller houses sold at the beginning. The builders apparently then rented out many of the remaining homes and the majority of the subdivision is still either rented or vacant. A California investor also purchased 5 of the larger homes for 289,000 in the summer of 2006.
Now fast forward to 2007. At least three of the smaller homes went into foreclosure and are now bank owned. Another two of the larger homes also went into foreclosure. All five of the investor homes were put on the market for 199,900 (90,000) less than he paid. None of them were sold even at the lower price and they have gone into foreclosure. Now here is where the bizarre pricing comes in.
Even though there were 1869' homes for sale for 199,900, one of the 1538' bank owned properties was originally priced by the bank at 229,000. They have since lowered it to 193,900. And as the 1869' homes go through foreclosure and become bank owned, the banks are listing them at a higher price than the owner listing.
There are six homes for sale as of today's listings. Two of the 1538' homes are 193,9000 and 195,500. The four 1869' homes are priced at 197,500, 199,900, 219,900, and 225,900. These houses are all the same, the two less expensive ones have never been lived in. The two more expensive ones may have been rentals.
Then we have the Rhodes Villas, another 69 home subdivision originally built and sold in late 2005. Nearly all were purchased by speculators and as they were completed were put back on the market for resale at an inflated price. A few were flipped for a profit in early 2006, but most owners ended up renting the homes out. By late 2006/early 2007, several were again put on the market. Some were priced at what they had paid, some were priced higher and some were priced lower. No real rhyme or reason to the "just pick a number" pricing.
Now fast forward to 2007. One of the original models was sold originally for 364,275 in 2005. The model was priced at about 140,000 above what the base prices were. The home went into foreclosure and is now bank owned. The bank has priced it at 199,000, it has 2192' and as of yet it has not sold. It has been listed for about 1.5 months. The second model home is still apparently owned by the original owner and may be rented. The third and final model home is owned by Rhodes and shows an original price of 299,824. It is currently on the market for 309,724 and has 1866'. The original non-model homes sold for 181, 825 to 255,875, depending on the upgrades added. The majority sold for around 181-205. A few are currently on the market, some priced at less than they paid in 2005.
There are many houses on the market priced at less than the current owners paid in 2005/2006. A house on our block is bank owned and priced at only $900. more than the last owner paid in 12/2004 and it has been on the market since August 8th.
As more and more foreclosures come on the market, opportunities to purchase homes for a reasonable amount should increase. The builder discounts and foreclosures should force the resale home prices down. Builders are continuing to grade and build homes, even as hundreds sit unsold on the market. Many home prices here doubled and tripled between late 2004 and early 2005 for no fundamental based reason. Lot prices went up as much as 20 times during the same period. The prices increased mainly due to a credit bubble and a frenzy of speculative buying. Prices are falling across the country and despite what the realtors tell you, it is not "different" in Mohave County.
If you are going to buy, do your own research. Do not depend on the advise of someone who's pay check depends on your purchase. Make sure you can afford the payments and don't depend on appreciation in the near future.
Labels:
Arizona,
bubble,
Bullhead City,
foreclosures,
Golden Valley,
home prices,
Kingman,
Mohave County
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Phoenix Flippers In Trouble
This blogger site has losses on specific houses shown. Each house shows the previous sales price and the current listing price. The blogger who recently started this site has been running a Sacramento Calif. Flipper loss site for years and decided to put Phoenix info on a new site.
http://phoenixflippers.blogspot.com/
http://phoenixflippers.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Arizona Housing Links
October 21, 2007
Homebuilders offer incentives, discounts
Misty Williams, Tribune
http://www.tribunehomefinder.com/story/100085
**********
New-home market flooded on outskirts as builders, owners compete
By Christie Smythe and Lourdes Medrano
Arizona DAily Star
Tucson, Arizona Published: 10.21.2007
When the market was at its peak, some of the hottest areas were northwest, southeast and southwest of the city. But now, buyers no longer line up to buy homes in outlying subdivisions. Instead, builders slash prices, pack on incentives and still are left with unsold spec homes and empty lots.
In many cases, homeowners trying to sell properties in newer developments are finding they can't compete with builders' rock-bottom prices.
Tucson housing market consultant John Strobeck, of Bright Future Business Consultants, declined to comment for this story. But previously, in describing his monthly sales report, the Southern Arizona Housing Market Letter, Strobeck said the market is suffering from an oversupply of both new and resale homes, and conditions might not improve until 2010.
http://www.azstarnet.com/dailystar/207396
**********
Many Valley homeowners pressured or tricked into bad loans, experts say
Catherine Reagor
The Arizona Republic
Oct. 21, 2007 12:00 AM
Arizona is second only to Nevada for subprime loans, and the mortgage industry is bleeding billions of dollars from losses on those types of loans. Interest rates on the biggest block of subprime adjustable-rate mortgages are set to climb by the end of the year, prompting market watchers to predict the largest jump in foreclosures to happen in early 2008.
Loose lending guidelines and speculators fueled the housing boom in 2004 and 2005.
Home prices across metropolitan Phoenix shot up 50 percent because of speculator-driven bidding wars. With little regulation in Arizona's mortgage industry, loan officers flocked to the state offering more creative, and often riskier, financing to any buyer who couldn't otherwise afford the rising home prices.
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/1021bad-loans1021.html
Homebuilders offer incentives, discounts
Misty Williams, Tribune
http://www.tribunehomefinder.com/story/100085
**********
New-home market flooded on outskirts as builders, owners compete
By Christie Smythe and Lourdes Medrano
Arizona DAily Star
Tucson, Arizona Published: 10.21.2007
When the market was at its peak, some of the hottest areas were northwest, southeast and southwest of the city. But now, buyers no longer line up to buy homes in outlying subdivisions. Instead, builders slash prices, pack on incentives and still are left with unsold spec homes and empty lots.
In many cases, homeowners trying to sell properties in newer developments are finding they can't compete with builders' rock-bottom prices.
Tucson housing market consultant John Strobeck, of Bright Future Business Consultants, declined to comment for this story. But previously, in describing his monthly sales report, the Southern Arizona Housing Market Letter, Strobeck said the market is suffering from an oversupply of both new and resale homes, and conditions might not improve until 2010.
http://www.azstarnet.com/dailystar/207396
**********
Many Valley homeowners pressured or tricked into bad loans, experts say
Catherine Reagor
The Arizona Republic
Oct. 21, 2007 12:00 AM
Arizona is second only to Nevada for subprime loans, and the mortgage industry is bleeding billions of dollars from losses on those types of loans. Interest rates on the biggest block of subprime adjustable-rate mortgages are set to climb by the end of the year, prompting market watchers to predict the largest jump in foreclosures to happen in early 2008.
Loose lending guidelines and speculators fueled the housing boom in 2004 and 2005.
Home prices across metropolitan Phoenix shot up 50 percent because of speculator-driven bidding wars. With little regulation in Arizona's mortgage industry, loan officers flocked to the state offering more creative, and often riskier, financing to any buyer who couldn't otherwise afford the rising home prices.
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/1021bad-loans1021.html
Labels:
Arizona,
bubble,
foreclosures,
home prices,
housing,
Phoenix,
real estate,
Tucson
Friday, October 19, 2007
Tucson - Analyst: Housing slowdown will linger until 2010
http://www.azstarnet.com/business/206856
Expects high inventory, sales slide will delay local recovery until 2010
By Christie Smythe
Arizona Daily Star
Tucson, Arizona Published: 10.18.2007
A Tucson housing market analyst is projecting a much deeper, longer slowdown than earlier anticipated.
In his monthly Southern Arizona Housing Market Letter, analyst John Strobeck said it might not recover until 2010 if inventory levels remain high and the sales pace stays the same.
"It will be at least that long, maybe longer," he said in a phone interview.
Expects high inventory, sales slide will delay local recovery until 2010
By Christie Smythe
Arizona Daily Star
Tucson, Arizona Published: 10.18.2007
A Tucson housing market analyst is projecting a much deeper, longer slowdown than earlier anticipated.
In his monthly Southern Arizona Housing Market Letter, analyst John Strobeck said it might not recover until 2010 if inventory levels remain high and the sales pace stays the same.
"It will be at least that long, maybe longer," he said in a phone interview.
Thursday, October 18, 2007
More California Housing
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_7175582?nclick_check=1
Big winners, losers at auction of new Manteca homes
THOSE WHO GOT HOUSES ARE ECSTATIC, PAYING FAR LESS THAN CURRENT OWNERS
By Julia Prodis SulekMercury News
When homeowner Dave Cantrell walked into the hotel ballroom Saturday where Anderson Homes was auctioning off one-third of the brand-new houses in his Manteca subdivision, he tried to be optimistic.
"I'm feeling my worst fears right now," said Cantrell, who estimated that the auction devalued his neighbors' homes by roughly $200,000 each compared with what many of them paid a year ago. "I lost a quarter million dollars in value. I'm screwed."
Cantrell bought his home a year ago for $670,000 (not including the $90,000 he paid to install a pool and miniature golf course). The winning bidder Saturday of an identical home five doors down the street paid $391,000 - 38 percent less than what he paid.
These houses are not in foreclosure. They are brand-new ones that Anderson Homes couldn't sell no matter how many free upgrades it offered.
**********
http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071016/A_NEWS/710160320/-1/A_BIZ
Stockton agent offering foreclosure bus tours
By Bruce Spence
Record Staff Writer
October 16, 2007 6:00 AM
STOCKTON - It's not a magic bus, just a vividly marked one - REPO HOME TOUR.COM - that real estate agent Cesar Dias hopes will work some magic for him in a bleak home-sales market.
Big winners, losers at auction of new Manteca homes
THOSE WHO GOT HOUSES ARE ECSTATIC, PAYING FAR LESS THAN CURRENT OWNERS
By Julia Prodis SulekMercury News
When homeowner Dave Cantrell walked into the hotel ballroom Saturday where Anderson Homes was auctioning off one-third of the brand-new houses in his Manteca subdivision, he tried to be optimistic.
"I'm feeling my worst fears right now," said Cantrell, who estimated that the auction devalued his neighbors' homes by roughly $200,000 each compared with what many of them paid a year ago. "I lost a quarter million dollars in value. I'm screwed."
Cantrell bought his home a year ago for $670,000 (not including the $90,000 he paid to install a pool and miniature golf course). The winning bidder Saturday of an identical home five doors down the street paid $391,000 - 38 percent less than what he paid.
These houses are not in foreclosure. They are brand-new ones that Anderson Homes couldn't sell no matter how many free upgrades it offered.
**********
http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071016/A_NEWS/710160320/-1/A_BIZ
Stockton agent offering foreclosure bus tours
By Bruce Spence
Record Staff Writer
October 16, 2007 6:00 AM
STOCKTON - It's not a magic bus, just a vividly marked one - REPO HOME TOUR.COM - that real estate agent Cesar Dias hopes will work some magic for him in a bleak home-sales market.
Labels:
auctions,
bubble,
California,
home prices,
housing
California Housing Articles
Some of these articles are on Riverside and San Bernardino counties. The closest counties to Mohave in both distance and weather. They are usually the first to fall in Cali bubbles and usually in the group that is hardest hit with declines.
http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_dataquick17.3e070b0.html
Inland housing sales plummet
12:23 PM PDT on Wednesday, October 17, 2007
By LESLIE BERKMAN The Press-Enterprise
Housing sales fell at a record rate and home prices declined by double digits last month in Riverside and San Bernardino counties.
**********
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20071017-9999-1n17housing.html
Housing slump persists
Credit crunch fuels drop in sales, prices in 6-county region
By Roger Showley
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
October 17, 2007
Home sales throughout Southern California plunged last month to their lowest levels in more than a decade, with prices falling in most areas as well, DataQuick Information Systems reported yesterday.
**********
http://www.whittierdailynews.com/news/ci_7198530
Region home sales lowest in 2 decades
Difficulties getting jumbo loans called major factor in downturn
By Michael Rappaport Staff Writer
Blame it on jumbo.
No, not the 1962 Doris Day/Jimmy Durante movie about a lovable elephant.
These jumbos are the mortgages required when a home loan exceeds federal lending limits, and they're a drag on the California housing market.
September home sales in the Southland were at their lowest level in more than 20 years, DataQuick Information Services reported Tuesday, and the difficulty in getting jumbo mortgages was a big factor.
Actually, the sales total of 12,455 homes in the region was the lowest for any month, edging the 12,459 sales in February 1995.
The biggest price drops came in San Bernardino County, off 11 percent to $325,000, and Riverside County, off 10.8 percent to $375,500.
"Things are clearly getting worse," said Christopher Thornberg, a principal with Beacon Economics. "It's going to remain terrible for some time."
**********
http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_7198220
Lenders that repossessed property slashing prices
BY GREGORY J. WILCOX and RICK COCA, Staff Writers
Article Last Updated: 10/17/2007 08:51:31 AM PDT
Looking to bottom feed in this depressed real estate market?
Try finding a foreclosure because you might snap it up for about 20 percent or more under its recent market value.
Take a foreclosed home in Winnekta on the market for $404,900. The asking price is 24 percent lower than what the former owner paid in June of 2006, according to Realtor Steve Smallson.
70 percent of homeowners who are foreclosed on bought their homes between 2003 and 2005. Homeowners who bought during this period and at the peak of the housing market are likely to be in a negative equity position now.
**********
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-fi-homes17oct17,1,6588480,full.story?coll=la-headlines-frontpage&ctrack=1&cset=true
Southland home sales and prices plummet
Southland purchases in September fall nearly 50% from a year earlier. Prices drop overall, but L.A. County's rise 1.2%.
By Peter Y. Hong and Maura Reynolds, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers October 17, 2007
Home sales in Southern California plummeted in September to a two-decade low, and a rash of grim housing-market assessments Tuesday suggested the worst is yet to come."We're on our way down and still picking up speed," said Christopher Thornberg, a Los Angeles-based economist who four years ago warned that the pace of housing price gains in the region couldn't be sustained.
Garden Grove real estate broker Patrick Schwier, who specializes in apartment buildings, said he had sold 70% fewer buildings this year compared with the same period in 2006, and recently saw one sale fall through when the potential buyer's loan application was rejected.
Schwier said he saw two more years of falling sales and prices.
"Prices were too inflated when credit was easier," he said, and now home prices, though they've been slipping, still "don't make sense. And they will drop until they make sense."
**********
http://www.ocregister.com/money/price-percent-down-1894419-last-sales
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Home prices fall, but many still can't buy
Orange County median falls below $600,000, but agents still have trouble moving inventory.
By JEFF COLLINS
The Orange County Register
The median price of an Orange County home fell 9.5 percent from the year before, dropping to $570,000. It is the first month in 2 ½ years that the median price – or the price at the midpoint of all sales – has dropped below $600,000.
That price was down $75,000, or nearly 12 percent, from the peak price of $645,000 reached in June. In the last down cycle, the drop from the peak to bottom was 16.3 percent from July 1991 to January 1996, according to DataQuick.
http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_dataquick17.3e070b0.html
Inland housing sales plummet
12:23 PM PDT on Wednesday, October 17, 2007
By LESLIE BERKMAN The Press-Enterprise
Housing sales fell at a record rate and home prices declined by double digits last month in Riverside and San Bernardino counties.
**********
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20071017-9999-1n17housing.html
Housing slump persists
Credit crunch fuels drop in sales, prices in 6-county region
By Roger Showley
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
October 17, 2007
Home sales throughout Southern California plunged last month to their lowest levels in more than a decade, with prices falling in most areas as well, DataQuick Information Systems reported yesterday.
**********
http://www.whittierdailynews.com/news/ci_7198530
Region home sales lowest in 2 decades
Difficulties getting jumbo loans called major factor in downturn
By Michael Rappaport Staff Writer
Blame it on jumbo.
No, not the 1962 Doris Day/Jimmy Durante movie about a lovable elephant.
These jumbos are the mortgages required when a home loan exceeds federal lending limits, and they're a drag on the California housing market.
September home sales in the Southland were at their lowest level in more than 20 years, DataQuick Information Services reported Tuesday, and the difficulty in getting jumbo mortgages was a big factor.
Actually, the sales total of 12,455 homes in the region was the lowest for any month, edging the 12,459 sales in February 1995.
The biggest price drops came in San Bernardino County, off 11 percent to $325,000, and Riverside County, off 10.8 percent to $375,500.
"Things are clearly getting worse," said Christopher Thornberg, a principal with Beacon Economics. "It's going to remain terrible for some time."
**********
http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_7198220
Lenders that repossessed property slashing prices
BY GREGORY J. WILCOX and RICK COCA, Staff Writers
Article Last Updated: 10/17/2007 08:51:31 AM PDT
Looking to bottom feed in this depressed real estate market?
Try finding a foreclosure because you might snap it up for about 20 percent or more under its recent market value.
Take a foreclosed home in Winnekta on the market for $404,900. The asking price is 24 percent lower than what the former owner paid in June of 2006, according to Realtor Steve Smallson.
70 percent of homeowners who are foreclosed on bought their homes between 2003 and 2005. Homeowners who bought during this period and at the peak of the housing market are likely to be in a negative equity position now.
**********
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-fi-homes17oct17,1,6588480,full.story?coll=la-headlines-frontpage&ctrack=1&cset=true
Southland home sales and prices plummet
Southland purchases in September fall nearly 50% from a year earlier. Prices drop overall, but L.A. County's rise 1.2%.
By Peter Y. Hong and Maura Reynolds, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers October 17, 2007
Home sales in Southern California plummeted in September to a two-decade low, and a rash of grim housing-market assessments Tuesday suggested the worst is yet to come."We're on our way down and still picking up speed," said Christopher Thornberg, a Los Angeles-based economist who four years ago warned that the pace of housing price gains in the region couldn't be sustained.
Garden Grove real estate broker Patrick Schwier, who specializes in apartment buildings, said he had sold 70% fewer buildings this year compared with the same period in 2006, and recently saw one sale fall through when the potential buyer's loan application was rejected.
Schwier said he saw two more years of falling sales and prices.
"Prices were too inflated when credit was easier," he said, and now home prices, though they've been slipping, still "don't make sense. And they will drop until they make sense."
**********
http://www.ocregister.com/money/price-percent-down-1894419-last-sales
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Home prices fall, but many still can't buy
Orange County median falls below $600,000, but agents still have trouble moving inventory.
By JEFF COLLINS
The Orange County Register
The median price of an Orange County home fell 9.5 percent from the year before, dropping to $570,000. It is the first month in 2 ½ years that the median price – or the price at the midpoint of all sales – has dropped below $600,000.
That price was down $75,000, or nearly 12 percent, from the peak price of $645,000 reached in June. In the last down cycle, the drop from the peak to bottom was 16.3 percent from July 1991 to January 1996, according to DataQuick.
Labels:
bubble,
California,
home prices,
housing,
mortgages,
Orange County,
subprime mortgages
House prices expected to fall until 2009
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Banking/HomebuyingGuide/HousePricesExpectedToFallUntil2009.aspx
The continuing spike in foreclosures and a glut of unsold homes will suppress housing prices at least through the end of next year, say officials with the biggest mortgage financiers.
U.S. housing prices will continue to decline at least through the end of next year and may not begin creeping upward again until 2010, executives from the nation's biggest mortgage financiers said Monday.
Officials with government-sponsored mortgage companies Fannie Mae (FNM, news, msgs) and Freddie Mac (FRE, news, msgs) and CEOs from two major mortgage banks told the Mortgage Bankers Association's annual convention that the continuing spike in foreclosures and a glut of unsold homes will prevent any quick price rebound.
"It's going to be a long time before we see it bottom out and recover," said David Lowman, chief executive of JPMorgan Chase's Global Mortgage unit. "There's too much inventory already in the marketplace."
The continuing spike in foreclosures and a glut of unsold homes will suppress housing prices at least through the end of next year, say officials with the biggest mortgage financiers.
U.S. housing prices will continue to decline at least through the end of next year and may not begin creeping upward again until 2010, executives from the nation's biggest mortgage financiers said Monday.
Officials with government-sponsored mortgage companies Fannie Mae (FNM, news, msgs) and Freddie Mac (FRE, news, msgs) and CEOs from two major mortgage banks told the Mortgage Bankers Association's annual convention that the continuing spike in foreclosures and a glut of unsold homes will prevent any quick price rebound.
"It's going to be a long time before we see it bottom out and recover," said David Lowman, chief executive of JPMorgan Chase's Global Mortgage unit. "There's too much inventory already in the marketplace."
Labels:
Fanny Mae,
Freddie Mac,
home prices,
housing,
JPMorgan
Las Vegas Articles
http://www.klas-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7217324
Jonathan Humbert, Reporter
Nevada Faces Budget Shortfall
Oct 16, 2007 03:36 PM MST
Nevada could be facing another budget shortfall which means state leaders are facing tough decisions about what services and programs to cut.
**********
http://www.lvrj.com/business/10571036.html
Oct. 16, 2007
REAL ESTATE INVESTOR SEES DEALS
By MARGARET ANN MIILLE REVIEW-JOURNAL
**********
http://www.lvrj.com/business/10571071.html
Oct. 16, 2007
To sell homes in down market, use strategy, observers say
By JENNIFER ROBISON REVIEW-JOURNAL
A foundering market with falling prices and more than 30,000 homes for sale in Southern Nevada. It's enough to paralyze any prospective home buyer. So how do home sellers convince skittish consumers that their place is a safe bet and that now is a solid time to buy? Realtors say pushing consumers off the fence requires a combination of emotional appeals and economic inducements. And for some sellers, the best answer is to sit out the market altogether.
Jonathan Humbert, Reporter
Nevada Faces Budget Shortfall
Oct 16, 2007 03:36 PM MST
Nevada could be facing another budget shortfall which means state leaders are facing tough decisions about what services and programs to cut.
**********
http://www.lvrj.com/business/10571036.html
Oct. 16, 2007
REAL ESTATE INVESTOR SEES DEALS
By MARGARET ANN MIILLE REVIEW-JOURNAL
**********
http://www.lvrj.com/business/10571071.html
Oct. 16, 2007
To sell homes in down market, use strategy, observers say
By JENNIFER ROBISON REVIEW-JOURNAL
A foundering market with falling prices and more than 30,000 homes for sale in Southern Nevada. It's enough to paralyze any prospective home buyer. So how do home sellers convince skittish consumers that their place is a safe bet and that now is a solid time to buy? Realtors say pushing consumers off the fence requires a combination of emotional appeals and economic inducements. And for some sellers, the best answer is to sit out the market altogether.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Phoenix Housing Articles
Here are some recent housing articles on Phoenix:
http://www.azcentral.com/business/articles/1016biz-AZresale16-ON.html
**************
http://www.azcentral.com/business/articles/1015biz-economy1016.html
Housing worries generally optimistic Valley experts
Betty BeardThe Arizona Republic Oct. 15, 2007 05:48 PM
"Brutal" and "perfect storm" are some of the descriptions local economists now use to describe economic conditions in Maricopa County.
While things could get worse before they get better, the economists said the area also has a diversified economy and continued job growth that will keep the climate from getting overly gloomy.
Governments are already noticing that spending is slowing down because of sales tax revenues at the state and county levels, said speakers addressing the Maricopa County Economic Forum Monday.
*************
http://www.builderonline.com/industry-news.asp?sectionID=26&articleID=591487
Ashton Woods Hit Hard By $10.6 Million Quarterly Loss
Atlanta-based builder is focusing on cutting costs and generating new orders through sales incentives.
During the quarter, the average sales price of this builder's homes fell 7.9 percent, to $270,000, with the biggest dip - 33.3 percent - in the Phoenix market, to $305,000. "Phoenix is one of the more depressed [housing] markets, with a tremendous price problem," Krobat told BUILDER during an interview earlier this month.
**************
http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/99713
Gilbert Esplanade sold
David Woodfill, Tribune
Developers of the planned Gilbert Esplanade have sold the property, becoming the second builder of a major retail center to announce an ownership change in less than a month.
Officials with Phoenix-based De Rito Partners said they decided to sell the site at Gilbert Road and the Loop 202 Santan Freeway to an Ohio-based firm when it was unable to fill an anchor space.........
Dawn McLaren, a research economist with the W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University in Tempe, said retail developers are feeling the new realities in the housing market. “Things have changed in Arizona, she said”
http://www.azcentral.com/business/articles/1016biz-AZresale16-ON.html
**************
http://www.azcentral.com/business/articles/1015biz-economy1016.html
Housing worries generally optimistic Valley experts
Betty BeardThe Arizona Republic Oct. 15, 2007 05:48 PM
"Brutal" and "perfect storm" are some of the descriptions local economists now use to describe economic conditions in Maricopa County.
While things could get worse before they get better, the economists said the area also has a diversified economy and continued job growth that will keep the climate from getting overly gloomy.
Governments are already noticing that spending is slowing down because of sales tax revenues at the state and county levels, said speakers addressing the Maricopa County Economic Forum Monday.
*************
http://www.builderonline.com/industry-news.asp?sectionID=26&articleID=591487
Ashton Woods Hit Hard By $10.6 Million Quarterly Loss
Atlanta-based builder is focusing on cutting costs and generating new orders through sales incentives.
During the quarter, the average sales price of this builder's homes fell 7.9 percent, to $270,000, with the biggest dip - 33.3 percent - in the Phoenix market, to $305,000. "Phoenix is one of the more depressed [housing] markets, with a tremendous price problem," Krobat told BUILDER during an interview earlier this month.
**************
http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/99713
Gilbert Esplanade sold
David Woodfill, Tribune
Developers of the planned Gilbert Esplanade have sold the property, becoming the second builder of a major retail center to announce an ownership change in less than a month.
Officials with Phoenix-based De Rito Partners said they decided to sell the site at Gilbert Road and the Loop 202 Santan Freeway to an Ohio-based firm when it was unable to fill an anchor space.........
Dawn McLaren, a research economist with the W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University in Tempe, said retail developers are feeling the new realities in the housing market. “Things have changed in Arizona, she said”
Labels:
Arizona,
home prices,
housing,
Maricopa,
Phoenix,
real estate
Monday, October 1, 2007
Housing Industry Outlook
I'm only putting a link because the realtor that wrote this piece does not allow postings on other sites. It is interesting because this is written by Mike Morgan who owns a real estate company in Florida and is an analyst and consultant also:
http://www.treasure-coast.us/weeklyupdate09-23-07
http://www.treasure-coast.us/weeklyupdate09-23-07
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)